Submission Instructions

  • All abstracts must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., February 6, 2015.
  • Accepted abstracts must contain:
  1. A hypothesis or research question being tested, or a disciplinary challenge being addressed and its importance or interest to you;
  2. Research and scholarly methods used; 
  3. Summary findings (even if preliminary); and a
  4. Conclusive statement.  Abstracts missing any of the items above will be rejected.
  • All fields within the submission portal must be completed.
  • Individuals who have video uploads must ensure privacy of the video submission.  Instructions for ensuring privacy can be accessed here.

Abstract Submissions Only Accepted from Undergraduate Students!

Abstracts Should Include the Following


Title

The title should reflect the content and emphasis of the project/research described (maximum of 30 words, in bold type, Times New Roman, font size - 16 pt. This is separate from the body of the abstract).


Name of Authors

The names of the authors including the department, college affiliation should appear separate from the abstract. The primary and co-advisors should be indicated as such. (The presenter's name should be underlined. Times New Roman, font size - 14 pt. This is also separate from the body of the abstract).


Body of the Abstract

An abstract is a brief, concise summarizing statement of the work, no longer than 150 words in length. It gives the reader a summary of the problem, method, results and conclusions of your work. To ensure quality, it is recommended that your abstract is reviewed by your faculty mentor. The body of the abstract should include the following elements:

1. Problem: Describe the problem or research question that is the subject of the study and the importance in studying this issue

2. Method: Describe the approach used to conduct the study (i.e., the procedures or methods)

3. Results: Describe the principal findings or results

Abstract Evaluation and Selection For Competition

  1. Clarity of the abstract. Does the abstract provide all of the information needed by the judges in order to make a selection? Is it concise and to the point?  
  2. Quality and relevance of the research, creative work. Is the work that is undertaken relevant to the current state of knowledge in the field? Is it a potentially important contribution to the field? Is it contextual? Are the conclusions supported by the results? Is the work of interest to a general audience?
  3. Creativity, originality and scientific validity. Is the work novel? Was the work carried out according to accepted and valid methods in the relevant field?