Table 3-7A. Instructional Track Evaluation Components for Assessment of Professional Development for Promotion

Rating

Definition

Excellent

Exemplary level of accomplishment.

Very Good

Exceptional level of accomplishment.

Good

Substantial level of accomplishment.

Fair

Few accomplishments.

Poor

No accomplishments. Substandard, ineffective development.
  1. Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion Cirteria and the Criteria and Processes Relating to Other Faculty Personnel Actions
    1. Renewal of Appointment, Performance Reviews, and Promotion of Full-Time Non-Tenure Track (FTNTT) Faculty
      1. Overview and General Information
      2. Policies and Procedures for FTNTT Renewal of Appointment
      3. Assessment of Professional Development for FTNTT Promotion
        1. Table 3-7A. Instructional Track Evaluation Components for Assessment of Professional Development for Promotion
        2. Table 3-7B. Criteria for Evaluation of Performance in Professional Development
    2. Faculty Peer Evaluations
© 2021 Kent State University All rights reserved.