Table 2. Evaluation Components for Assessment of Teaching for Tenure and Promotion
Teaching Assessment
|
Description |
Accomplishments Corresponding to the Assessment Score |
Excellent |
Innovative educator and an educational leader
|
Active participation in curricular development and revisions, develop new and revise existing courses, supervises undergraduate and graduate research projects, supervises students’ design competitions and publishing, excellent student and peer evaluations, instructional creativity, teaching awards
|
Very Good |
Innovative educator |
Develop new and revise existing courses, above average student evaluations and peer evaluations, work with graduate and/or undergraduate students in research and/or creative activity |
Good |
Meets obligations well |
Average student and peer evaluations, demonstrated strength in teaching, communicates well |
Fair |
Substandard teacher |
No curricular involvement and no development of new or revised course content, below average student and peer evaluations |
Poor |
substandard, ineffective teacher |
No curricular involvement and no development of new or revised course content, below average student and peer evaluations, pattern of complaints |