Standards for the Evaluation of Scholarship and Research

All faculty of the department are expected to seek excellence in scholarly activity. The Department insists, to the extent possible, on documented evidence of the peer evaluation of all scholarships. It is the duty of the candidate for reappointment, tenure, and/or promotion to provide that documentation. Scholarly monographs, edited collections, and synthetic works must be published by appropriate presses that conduct anonymous scholarly reviews (vanity presses are not considered appropriate). The same criterion holds true for chapters or portions of books. The Department is sensitive to the fact that budgetary difficulties are having a serious impact on university presses and commercial presses with scholarly lists and reducing the number of scholarly publications in hard copy. Therefore, other outlets for publication of works in the various scholarships, such as online publication, public history related presentation, or documentary film production, are acceptable if subjected to the same scholarly peer review described above. To achieve "excellent" in the category of the scholarship at the time a faculty member stands for tenure and promotion, she/he should have established a research program which demonstrates an impact upon his/her discipline, which can be evinced by citations, reviews, and invited presentations. Within this context, during annual reappointment reviews, each faculty member who will seek tenure or promotion is obligated to provide some evidence supporting his/her scholarly record.  In turn, the members of the Department's Ad Hoc RTP Committee and the Chair shall evaluate a candidate's record in light of the Department's expectations for a successful tenure decision.

  1. Table 2A

    Kent Campus: Evaluation Components for Assessment of Scholarship for Reappointment review, Tenure (see Regional above), and promotion to the  Associate rank.
    Scholarship Definition  Accomplishments  Corresponding to the Assessment Score

    Scholarship

    Definition

    Accomplishments  Corresponding to the Assessment Score

     

     

     

     

    Excellent

     

     

     

    Nationally/Internationally recognized research program

    Publication of a historical monograph from an appropriate press after completion of a process of scholarly review.  Publication is defined as either "in press" -- meaning that the manuscript had been peer reviewed, revised, and is at least at the copy- editing stage -- or "in hand."

     

     

     

    Very Good

     

     

    Emerging nationally recognized research program

    Demonstrated record of publications in the form of articles, chapters in books, Public History related presentations, translations, digital documentary presentations, and submitted grant (internal and external) applications.

     

     

     

    Good

     

     

     

    Active research program

    Emerging record of publication in the form of book reviews, encyclopedia articles, non peer-reviewed publications, submitted grant (internal or external) applications, conference presentations at meetings I seminars.

     

    Weak

     

    Limited research program

    Internal presentations, local publications and/or meeting presentations.

    Poor

    No research program

    No publications, presentations, or grants.