Table 1 | Kent State University

Table 1

Assessment of Teaching Worksheet for Tenure-Track Faculty

Overall evaluation of teaching:

Excellent: Superior teaching performance with external recognition

Very Good: Actively engaged in teaching activities with demonstrable success

Adequate: Meets teaching obligations, including appropriate course preparation, delivery and evaluation

Unacceptable: Does not meet teaching obligations

Aside from “formal peer evaluation” and “student evaluations of instruction,” the candidate
is not expected to provide evidence in all categories listed below.

Criteria                                                                                           Evaluation                                         Notes/Discussion Point

 

Formal peer evaluation

 

 

 

Student Evaluations of Instruction

 

 

 

Quality of content, includes current knowledge and practice

 

 

 

Quality and clarity of syllabi, assignments, tests, quizzes, grading rubrics, etc.

 

 

 

Effective delivery with learning-centered techniques and tools

 

 

 

Assessment of learning outcomes, documentation of successes and improvements

 

 

 

Development or revision of courses, program development

 

 

 

Scholarly/creative work on pedagogy

 

 

 

Counseling, advising, mentoring, tutoring

 

 

 

Co-curricular advising

 

 

 

M.A. theses, projects, Ind. Studies, Honors

 

 

 

Course Innovation

 

 

 

Overall evaluation

 

 

 

Notes on overall evaluation