Table 2 | Kent State University

Table 2

Assessment of Scholarly/Creative Activity Worksheet for Tenure-Track Faculty

Overall evaluation of scholarly/creative activity:

             Excellent: Achieved national and/or international prominence for creative and/or scholarly activity

            Very Good: Emerging nationally recognized body of creative and/or scholarly activity.

            Adequate: Active body of creative and/or scholarly activity

             Unacceptable:  Insufficient body of creative and/or scholarly activity

            The candidate is not expected to provide evidence in all the categories listed below.

Criteria                                                                                 Evaluation                                                  Notes/Discussion Point

 

 

Well-defined, focused agenda

 

 

 

Consistent activity leading to publication and presentation

 

 

 

Published work in appropriate professional or academic venues significant to School’s mission

 

 

 

Evidence of quality of work through external review or juried assessment

 

 

 

Evidence of quality of work through citations, awards, invitations to publish or present

 

 

 

Evidence of quality through generation of external funding

 

 

 

Overall impact on discipline, profession

 

 

 

 

Overall evaluation

 

 

 

 

Notes on overall evaluation

 

 
  1. Appendix
    1. Table 1
    2. Table 2
    3. Table 3
    4. Table 4
    5. Table 5
    6. Table 6
© 2018 Kent State University All rights reserved.