Table 2
Assessment of Scholarly/Creative Activity Worksheet for Tenure-Track Faculty
Overall evaluation of scholarly/creative activity:
Excellent: Achieved national and/or international prominence for creative and/or scholarly activity
Very Good: Emerging nationally recognized body of creative and/or scholarly activity.
Adequate: Active body of creative and/or scholarly activity
Unacceptable: Insufficient body of creative and/or scholarly activity
The candidate is not expected to provide evidence in all the categories listed below.
Criteria Evaluation Notes/Discussion Point |
||
Well-defined, focused agenda |
|
|
Consistent activity leading to publication and presentation |
|
|
Published work in appropriate professional or academic venues significant to School’s mission |
|
|
Evidence of quality of work through external review or juried assessment |
|
|
Evidence of quality of work through citations, awards, invitations to publish or present |
|
|
Evidence of quality through generation of external funding |
|
|
Overall impact on discipline, profession |
|
|
Overall evaluation |
|
|
Notes on overall evaluation |
|
|