Table 1. Evaluation Components for Research/Creative Scholarship
Scholarship Rating |
Research or Creative Scholarship is defined by: |
Typical Accomplishments Corresponding to the Assessment |
Excellent |
Associate Professor: Promising record with emerging national/international recognition
Full Professor: Sustained record with national/international recognition |
Demonstrated significant record of peer-reviewed publications and/or exhibitions. Presentations at professional meetings with rigorous peer review criteria. Invitations to give presentations/lectures/exhibitions. Review of works featured in national/international journals. Recognition by professional organizations at regional/national/international level. Recognition of scholarly impact by peers in the profession. |
Very Good |
Defined emphasis and emerging national recognition |
Demonstrated consistent record of peer-reviewed publications and/or exhibitions. Presentations at professional meetings with peer review criteria. |
Good |
Developing focus and active engagement |
Some Publications and/or exhibitions. Some Presentations at professional meetings/seminars. |
Fair |
Unfocused direction and limited engagement |
Occasional publications/exhibitions or meeting presentations. |
Poor |
Undefined research program or creative practice |
Few or no publications, presentations, exhibitions, or professional recognition. |