Table 2. Evaluation Components for Teaching
Scholarship Rating |
Definition |
Typical Activities Corresponding to the Assessment |
Excellent |
Innovative teacher; provides leadership in instructional development and maintains high achievement on course evaluation and peer reviews |
Actively participates in curricular development/revisions. Demonstrates evidences excellent student evaluations and peer review. Demonstrates instructional creativity and effort. Establishes excellent record of graduate and/or undergraduate students in research and/or creative scholarship. Receives recognition of educational impact by peers in the institution and profession. |
Very Good |
Innovative teacher; maintains very good course evaluations and peer reviews |
Develops/revises curriculum, establishes good student evaluations and peer review. Demonstrate good record of fostering graduate and/or undergraduate students in research and/or creative scholarship. |
Good |
Effective teacher; maintains good course evaluations and peer reviews |
Develops/revises curriculum, establishes mixed (moderate to good) student evaluations and peer review. Develops moderate level of fostering graduate and undergraduate research projects and/or creative activity. |
Fair |
Substandard teacher; meets minimal expectations; below average course evaluations and peer reviews |
Establishes below-average student evaluations and peer review; has limited supervision of student research, limited participation in curriculum development and/or revision. |
Poor |
Substandard, ineffective teacher; unacceptable course evaluations and peer reviews |
Establishes below-average student and peer perceptions, Receives as a pattern of complaints Have not engaged in curriculum development or research supervision |