Regular and Substantive Interaction (RSI) in Online Courses

This page will explore regular and substantive interaction (RSI) in online courses, including an overview of the federal regulation, ways that instructors can meet the requirements, and related resources.

What is RSI?

The U.S. Department of Education issued Final Rules on Distance Education and Innovation in September 2020, with the rules going into effect on July 1, 2021. The new regulations update the definitions of distance and correspondence education with the intent to provide more clarity on the differences between these two modes of course delivery.  The U.S. Department of Education requires that all online courses for which students may use Title IV funds (federal financial aid) include regular and substantive interaction between students and instructors. In short, regular and substantive interaction (RSI) is one of the key elements distinguishing distance education from correspondence education and thus one of the central determinates for students’ ability to use Title IV funds. 

For interactions to be considered RSI, they need to meet the following characteristics:

  • They should be mostly instructor-initiated

  • They need to be regular, scheduled, and predictable, and

  • They must be substantive, i.e,. focused on the course subject.

For purposes of this definition, substantive interaction is engaging students in teaching, learning, and assessment, consistent with the content under discussion, and also includes at least two of the following—

  • Providing direct instruction;

  • Assessing or providing feedback on a student’s coursework;

  • Providing information or responding to questions about the content of a course or competency;

  • Facilitating a group discussion regarding the content of a course or competency; or,

  • Other instructional activities approved by the institution’s or program’s accrediting agency.

An institution ensures regular interaction between a student and an instructor or instructors by, prior to the student’s completion of a course or competency—

  • Providing the opportunity for substantive interactions with the student on a predictable and regular basis commensurate with the length of time and the amount of content in the course or competency; and

  • Monitoring the student’s academic engagement and success and ensuring that an instructor is responsible for promptly and proactively engaging in substantive interaction with the student when needed, on the basis of such monitoring, or upon request by the student.

How Do I Include RSI in My Course?

RSI is more than a federal regulation; it is an integral part of online teaching that can be planned during course design and incorporated during course delivery. 

Below are example strategies aligned with the five methods of substantive interaction. This list is not exhaustive—individual instructors may choose other approaches that best fit their course and teaching style.

When planning for RSI, aim to incorporate at least one strategy from two or more of the five methods on a consistent basis. For a standard 15-week term, this typically means engaging weekly. In shorter, accelerated courses (e.g., 5-week terms), interaction may occur more frequently, such as 2–3 times per week. 

Substantive Method 1: Providing Direct Instruction
DescriptionDesign StrategiesDelivery Strategies
Direct instruction is intended to be a synchronous environment where both the instructor and student are present at the same time and are both engaged. In an asynchronous course, direct instruction can also include asynchronous activities, such as instructor participation in discussions, providing feedback, and office hour interactions with students focused on the course content.  
  • The course and/or syllabus include placeholders for information about office/student hours and/or study sessions.

  • Pre-recorded lectures are accompanied by a discussion forum or other interactive activity. 

  • NOTE: Pre-recorded lecture content alone is not sufficient for RSI but can contribute to meeting the requirement when combined with other course activities such as a related course discussion or interactive assignment.  

  • Regularly scheduled office/student hours are clearly stated in the syllabus and/or the course. 

  • The instructor offers optional live study sessions, such as a review session prior to a major assessment. 

  • The instructor initiates 1:1 sessions with students around course topics based on need.

  • The instructor contributes regularly to course discussions or other interactive activities. 

Substantive Method 2: Assessing or Providing Feedback on Students’ Coursework
DescriptionDesign StrategiesDelivery Strategies

Assessing or providing feedback on students’ coursework refers to the instructor’s active and ongoing role in evaluating student work and offering meaningful, individualized responses that guide improvement and deepen understanding.

Feedback must be from the instructor and direct student learning. It can be provided in various formats, such as written, video, or audio comments, or a live discussion with the student.

NOTE: Automated grading does not count as RSI alone and should be accompanied by additional personalized feedback from the instructor during delivery. 

  • The course syllabus includes a section for the instructor’s feedback plan, such as methods, tools, and expected turn-around time.

  • The course design includes assessments and activities that provide the opportunity for regular and substantive feedback.

  • The course schedule considers the pacing of assignments so that there is sufficient time for the instructor to provide feedback and the student to incorporate it into future assessments. 

  • The instructor provides regular, individualized feedback that goes beyond assigning scores, such as written/audio/video comments.

  • Feedback is provided in enough time for students to apply it to future work.

  • Auto-graded assessments are reviewed, and individualized comments are provided.

  • Assessments using standardized rubrics include additional personalized feedback. 

  • Individual and whole class participation is reviewed at regular intervals, and the instructor initiates interaction as needed. 

  • Whole class feedback is provided via announcements, emails, or discussion summaries, including helpful guidance around topics that may need re-visited by the entire class. 

Substantive Method 3: Providing Information or Responding to Questions about the Content of a Course or Competency
DescriptionDesign StrategiesDelivery Strategies

Providing information or responding to questions qualifies as RSI when the instructor offers timely, content-specific guidance that supports learning outcomes. This includes elaborating on course material, clarifying difficult concepts, or helping students apply course content.

NOTE: To count towards RSI, these activities must be academic and relevant to the course, not just include logistics like due dates, how to use a platform or app, general study practices, etc.  

  • The course and/or syllabus include placeholders for the instructor’s contact information and preferred communication tools.

  • The course and/or syllabus include placeholders for a communication plan that explains how the instructor will initiate interaction with students through individual and group communication.

  • The Announcements tool is enabled in the course.

  • The course includes an FAQ and/or Open Question Forum and a plan for how and when the instructor will respond.

  • Feedback surveys or reflections about course content are included at designated intervals throughout the course. 

  • The course and syllabus are updated with preferred contact information.

  • The instructor shares their communication plan with students and responds to students in a prompt and substantive way.

  • The instructor sends announcements at regular intervals that are substantive in nature and support instruction, such as summarizing the prior week’s learning, clarifying questions, previewing upcoming content, offering FAQs on an assessment, etc.

  • The instructor reviews the FAQ/Open Question Forum and responds with substantive information.

  • The instructor reviews feedback surveys and/or reflections and incorporates student feedback in a timely manner. 

Substantive Method 4: Facilitating a Group Discussion Regarding the Content of a Course or Competency
DescriptionDesign StrategiesDelivery Strategies
Facilitating discussion qualifies as RSI when the instructor initiates, leads, or meaningfully engages in group conversations that directly relate to the course content or competencies, such as prompting, moderating, and contributing to discussions in a way that deepens understanding, fosters critical thinking, and aligns with learning objectives.  
  • Discussion forums are present throughout the course at regular intervals and relate to course content.

  • Group projects include built-in opportunities for instructor interaction.

  • Other collaborative activities are present, such as those that require working together on a document or presentation. 

  • The instructor reviews the module discussion forums and provides guidance, answers questions, makes connections, and clarifies content.

  • The instructor uses various discussion response techniques such as individual responses, summary responses, or posting an announcement with the main ideas and/or common misconceptions.

  • The instructor initiates interaction with groups at regular intervals during projects, providing guidance, feedback, and allowing students the opportunity to ask questions.

  • The instructor initiates engagement during collaborative activities by maintaining presence, regularly reviewing students' work, or adding comments and guidance as needed. 

Substantive Method 5: Other Instructional Activities Approved by the Institution’s or Program’s Accrediting Agency
DescriptionDesign StrategiesDelivery Strategies
Meaningful learning interactions as approved by the course, program, or accrediting body. These activities can meet RSI standards by being planned, instructor-initiated, regular, and focused on course content. 
  • Additional RSI strategies not previously mentioned may be appropriate to build into the design of the course depending on program or content area. 
  • Additional RSI strategies not previously mentioned may be appropriate to facilitate depending on program or content area. 

Learn More

RSI Self-Paced Training Course. This course introduces instructors to the fundamentals of Regular and Substantive Interaction (RSI). Participants will learn what RSI is, why it is required by federal regulations, and how to begin incorporating it into their course design and delivery. 

RSI Reference Guide. This downloadable guide provides an overview of RSI as well as recommended strategies for each method of substantive interaction that you might consider when incorporating RSI into your own course design and delivery.  

Review Your Course. The self-assessment provides an opportunity for you to reflect on whether you are incorporating RSI strategies that align to at least 2 of the 5 methods of substantive interaction on a consistent basis in your own course.

Kent State Online Syllabus Toolkit. This web resource includes a sample syllabus template with language that you may find helpful as you determine how to include your plan for RSI in your own course syllabus. 

Need Help with RSI?

Our helpful team of instructional designers at Kent State Online is available to support your work as you incorporate RSI into your online course. In addition to our central office, several of the colleges on the Kent campus, as well as regional campuses, have in-house Instructional Designers and Educational Technology Designers. Find your contact or submit a ticket for support

 

References