Table 1: Ratings Criteria of Teaching for Tenure at the Kent Campus | Department of Finance Handbook | Kent State University

Table 1: Ratings Criteria of Teaching for Tenure at the Kent Campus


Rating


Course Design


Course Delivery


Other considerations

 

Excellent

 

Exemplar Course Design

 

Very good student and peer evaluations.

 

Very active dissertation committee participation. Very active participation in Ph.D. research mentorship program. Significant value added in programmatic curricular matters.

 

Very Good

 

Effective Course Design

 

Good student and peer evaluations.

 

Active dissertation committee participation. Active participation in Ph.D. research mentorship program. Value added in programmatic curricular matters.

 

Good

 

Effective Course Design

 

Good student and peer evaluations.

 

Some participation in Ph.D. research mentorship program or programmatic curricular matters.

 

Fair

 

Ineffective Course Design

 

Consistently below average student and peer evaluations.

 

Little, if any, participation in dissertation committees, Ph.D. mentorship, and programmatic curricular matters.

 

Poor

 

Ineffective Course Design

 

Consistently well below average student and peer evaluations.

 

Persistent pattern of complaints. Little, if any, participation in dissertation committees, Ph.D. mentorship, and programmatic curricular matters.