Table 3: Ratings Criteria of University Citizenship for Tenure for Faculty Members at the Kent Campus | Department of Finance Handbook | Kent State University

Table 3: Ratings Criteria of University Citizenship for Tenure for Faculty Members at the Kent Campus


Rating


Service Output

 

Excellent

 

Significant service and significant value added to the functioning of the Department.

 

Significant role in Department, Campus, College and/or University as evidenced by productive service on committees, active participation in significant events, effectively chairing committees, specific administrative assignments, meaningful public outreach, directorship of programs, chairs, etc.

 

 

Very Good

 

Sustained service and positive value added to the functioning of the Department.

 

Sustained role in Department, Campus, College and/or University as evidenced by productive service on committees, active participation in significant events, effectively chairing committees, specific administrative assignments, meaningful public outreach, directorship of programs, chairs, etc.

 

 

Good

 

Some positive value added to the functioning of the Department.

 

Some role in Department, Campus, College and/or University productive service on committees, active participation in significant events, effectively chairing committees, specific administrative assignments, meaningful public outreach, directorship of programs, chairs, etc.

 

 

Fair

 

Meets the minimal Department/Campus obligations by participating within Department/College/University.

 

 

Poor

 

Does not meet Department/Campus obligations in a timely manner or does not actively participate in significant Department/campus events.