Review Committee Reporting
From these meetings and the Self-study report, the review committee will generate a written report to be submitted within four weeks of the site visit. The external reviewers are responsible for writing the final report, although the internal reviewer may be asked to provide information and/or clarification.
The report should include a separate one to two page Executive Summary that briefly outlines the committee findings (program strengths, challenges/opportunities and recommendations) and then a more in-depth narrative report of the program (eight to ten pages). The narrative should be evaluative rather than descriptive, and should be forward-looking, not simply a retelling of the program’s current status.
The APR Committee Report Guide mirrors the format of the program's Self-study and can be used as a guide in preparing developing the final report.
The sections that should be covered in the reviewer’s report include:
Program and Department Context
Curriculum, Assessment of Student Learning and Program Improvement
Current Students
Academic Support and Career Development Opportunities
Alumni
Faculty, Administration and Staff
Facilities and Resources